This blog is hosted on Ideas on EuropeIdeas on Europe Avatar


‘Brexit’ and Anti-Discrimination Law in Northern Ireland

Publication resulting from the UACES 2017 PhD and ECR Conference

The UK’s withdrawal from the European Union is bound to pose unique challenges for Northern Ireland, writes Clare Rice. Drawing on her research on anti-discrimination law in the region, she outlines the potential impact on the legal framework for equality and cross-community relations.

Stormont Buildings  © trevorb

The potential impact of ‘Brexit’ has been widely debated since the historic referendum of 23rd June 2016, not least in Northern Ireland. However, the challenges ‘Brexit’ will present there are different to those that will be faced elsewhere in the UK. From the perspective of anti-discrimination law, this piece considers what some of these key challenges might be, given the contextual specificities of the region.

By way of summary, Northern Ireland is a devolved region of the United Kingdom (UK). While this in itself does not make it unique in the UK, the way in which its institutions are arranged does. They are arranged according to the principles of consociationalism, an outcome of deep-seated divisions and protracted conflict in the region.

The key protagonists to this conflict, the Protestant/unionist and Catholic/nationalist communities, are the groupings around which these arrangements are designed. The Good Friday (Belfast) Agreement 1998 (GFA), which gave rise to this power-sharing architecture in Northern Ireland, was a pivotal point in the region’s peace process which is still on-going today.

It is necessary to give this brief overview of the Northern Irish situation. This division has influenced the shape and somewhat nuanced conception of equality in the region, cast first and foremost in terms of the conflicting groupings. For historical, conflict-related reasons, equality from a ‘consociational perspective’ is a relative concept between the communities in Northern Ireland; as a vital underpinning to the peace process, equality between these two groupings must be ensured.

When approached from a legal perspective (if we assume it is possible to disentangle a ‘legal perspective’ on equality from one derived from political necessity as outlined above) it is clear that equality in legal terms is a much broader concept – while still inclusive of community-oriented equality, the legal equality framework in Northern Ireland extends far beyond this parameter.

European Union (EU) law is only one source of anti-discrimination law in Northern Ireland. It is incorporated into law in Westminster. However, much of the competence for creating anti-discrimination law in Northern Ireland rests at Stormont. It, too, is directly influenced by EU law, seen, for example, in employment legislation where discrimination must be prohibited on at least the same grounds as established in EU law. A noteworthy exception is the presence of a 50/50 recruitment policy for Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) officers in the years following the GFA; this was necessary to legitimate the body across the communities.

So, what impact will ‘Brexit’ have on all of this? A consideration of the GFA and the Northern Ireland Act 1998 is a good place to start:

Firstly, the Act states that legislation made in Northern Ireland must be compatible with EU law. Secondly, those rights afforded to Northern Irish citizens under EU law as a result of dual-citizenship – a key feature of the GFA – are placed under threat by the UK exiting the EU. Furthermore, ‘Brexit’ arguably brings the danger of incurring amendment to the Act, which enshrines in law the hard-fought GFA peace accord. If badly handled, this could entail serious consequences, both politically and socially, in Northern Ireland.

A further point is that the Great Repeal Bill, if passed into law, will serve to reinforce existing EU law at first, but a process of unpicking this body of law may follow. For example, the UK Supreme Court will be the final authority, since it will not be possible to recourse to the European Court of Justice (ECJ), which has in the past been an effective way of advancing anti-discrimination law in Northern Ireland. With time, this could result in divergences between UK and EU anti-discrimination law.

The prevalence of identity in considering the Northern Irish case rises again here. For Northern Ireland, which will share a land border with the EU, a divergence in equality law would be most visible to citizens there compared to elsewhere in the UK. It, alongside any uncertainty in the discourse around the dual-national status of Northern Irish citizens (for instance), could ultimately contribute to further polarising the extremes within Northern Ireland. The divisive impact of ‘Brexit’ is already being witnessed in Northern Ireland, most clearly seen in the 2017 Assembly and Westminster election results. It would be remiss to rule out the damage such divergences could make to the peace process overall.

On the other hand, ‘Brexit’ may present an opportunity for Northern Ireland to become more creative with its anti-discrimination law. As most equality law is already shaped in Stormont, approaches could be taken which ensure that Northern Irish anti-discrimination law remains comparable with that in the Republic of Ireland.

It also, potentially, provides greater space for Northern Ireland’s specific anti-discrimination legislative needs to be met innovatively, as its post-conflict society continues to develop. This is particularly pertinent given the potential for increased tensions between the two main communities post-Brexit. To this end, a return to discussion on a Bill of Rights for Northern Ireland might well be prudent.


This piece by no means attempts to present a fulsome breakdown of all the potential outcomes of ‘Brexit’ in Northern Ireland. It aims to highlight the complexity of the legal framework for equality in the region, and provoke thought on some of the key issues that ‘Brexit’ raises in relation to this.

Only time will tell how this develops, but what is certain is that Northern Ireland is heading into a period of great upheaval which could present very real difficulties for the peace process. This in turn will require innovative thinking in many areas, not least in the equality law framework, if it is to remain robust and capable of adequately addressing some tensions that ‘Brexit’ could present for cross-community relations in the region.

  • This article was written following the author’s presentation at the UACES Graduate Forum Conference in July 2017.
  • Please note that this article represents the views of the author(s) and not those of the UACES Student Forum or UACES.
  • Comments and Site Policy
  • Shortlink to this article:

Clare Rice @Clare_Rice_
Queen’s University Belfast

Clare Rice is a PhD Candidate and Teaching Assistant at Queen’s University Belfast School of Law. Her research interests include Northern Ireland, Belgium, consociationalism, constitutional law, identity politics, equality law, EU law and employment.


Recent Articles

Critical European Studies Need More Than Foucault

Published on by | No Comments

How can we create spaces for critical discussion about the European Union? Vanessa Bilancetti writes in response to Rachael Dickson Hillyard’s article on alternative approaches to EU Studies. Through her own research on institutional responses to the economic crisis, Vanessa Bilancetti identifies dissenting voices that can enrich an ongoing debate. I have read with interest […]

Measuring the Impact of EU Accession on Potential Candidate Country Parliaments

Published on by | 1 Comment

Publication resulting from the UACES 2017 PhD and ECR Conference The impact of an EU membership perspective on the national parliament of potential candidate countries is an important yet underexplored subject, writes Blerim Vela. Outlining some of the elements of his research, he suggests that the executive-legislature relationship and strength of the media and civil society […]

Why the EU Needs ‘De-crisising’

Published on by | Comments Off on Why the EU Needs ‘De-crisising’

Publication resulting from the UACES 2017 PhD and ECR Conference The usage of the term ‘crisis’ when discussing the EU’s current challenges has become widespread in media reporting, writes Max Steuer. Drawing from his analysis of quality newspapers in several Visegrad countries, where calls for the EU to address problems have often been accompanied by opposition […]

Taking an Alternative Approach to Doing EU Studies: Using Foucault’s Thinking to Better Understand the EU and Migration

Published on by | 1 Comment

Publication resulting from the UACES 2017 PhD and ECR Conference The journey of connecting your research interests and questions as a PhD student with an effective means of exploring them can sometimes be challenging, writes Rachael Dickson Hillyard. Reflecting on her research critically analysing EU narratives on good governance and rights-based policies, she argues that it […]

The Spectre of the ‘Welfare Tourist’ within the Judgements of the CJEU

Published on by | Comments Off on The Spectre of the ‘Welfare Tourist’ within the Judgements of the CJEU

Publication resulting from the UACES 2017 PhD and ECR Conference Although little evidence supports the existence of welfare tourism, the EU’s Court of Justice has increasingly adopted this economic rationale in its rulings, writes Charles O’Sullivan. He argues that the court, having departed from its original legal test for social assistance claims in several decisions, is […]

Harmful Cyber Operations in the EU: Implementing the NIS Directive into the UK Legal System

Published on by | Comments Off on Harmful Cyber Operations in the EU: Implementing the NIS Directive into the UK Legal System

Publication resulting from the UACES 2017 PhD and ECR Conference The prevalence of cybersecurity threats against state infrastructure demonstrates the need for an effective European and national response, writes Eva Saeva. Focusing on the UK, she argues that, while legal measures are important, the fast-changing nature of the situation means that other avenues, such as public-private cooperation, […]

Why Brexit’s Impact on EU Foreign Policy Might Remain Limited

Published on by | Comments Off on Why Brexit’s Impact on EU Foreign Policy Might Remain Limited

Publication resulting from the UACES 2017 PhD and ECR Conference While last year’s Brexit vote marked a watershed moment for the European Union, its impact on EU foreign policy might remain limited, writes Ragnar Weilandt. He argues that the UK’s dual role as a provider of capabilities and occasional driver of policy on the one hand, and […]

How to Write for an Academic Blog

Published on by | 1 Comment

Blogs are increasingly relevant to researchers and, for those starting out in contributing to them, it can be useful to reflect on the differences with other outputs, writes Anthony Salamone. He sets out some suggestions on how to approach writing for an academic blog, including how to gain the most from the experience. As academia […]

Cyprus Peace Talks at a Stalemate: What Hope for Reconciliation?

Published on by | Comments Off on Cyprus Peace Talks at a Stalemate: What Hope for Reconciliation?

The substantial progress made in the Cyprus peace negotiations over the past 20 months risks falling short of success, as politics and grievances resurface, writes Fadıl Ersözer. He argues that true political leadership is required from both sides to achieve a lasting solution, and that the European Union as a framework can still be an […]

Brexit, Trump, Le Pen? How France’s Institutions Will Make It Difficult for Le Pen to Win the Election and Govern

Published on by | Comments Off on Brexit, Trump, Le Pen? How France’s Institutions Will Make It Difficult for Le Pen to Win the Election and Govern

In the wake of populist successes in the UK and the US, Viviane Gravey examines the prospects for a Front National victory in the upcoming 2017 French presidential election. She argues that, while the institutional structure of French politics would limit the room for manoeuvre of Marine Le Pen, it is ultimately the responsibility of […]

  • Crossroads Europe is edited by the UACES Graduate Forum in collaboration with JCER (Journal of Contemporary European Research).

    Current Editors: Anthony Salamone, Quincy Cloet and Anna Wambach

  • Recent Articles

  • About Crossroads

  • Follow us

  • UACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors.